New Facebook Alerts: – We have been totally on this fire for a long time
The US Congress has released new documents as part of the ongoing Facebook investigation.
Additionally, a new whistleblower has released a legal statement accusing the social media giant of dismissing concerns about the spread of disinformation and hate speech.
The documents and the statement support warnings from Francis Haugen’s claim that Facebook puts profit over security, and he now writes for several international media outlets who gained access to edited versions of the documents through the Congressional Security Committee. .
– We all have gasoline on fire
Documents show that many Facebook employees reacted aggressively during the Congressional storm on January 6, according to AP. Press Agency.
Already at the time of the intrusion, employees reportedly lodged a complaint with management on internal communication platforms.
Haven’t we had time to figure out how to organize discussions without facilitating violence? An employee asked in the conversation?
We’ve had gas on these fires for a long time, and we shouldn’t be surprised they’re out of control now.
The last leaked document was reported in several US media.
According to AP They showed that Facebook was completely unaware that the storming of Congress was planned via the network. This is despite the fact that US authorities have been investigating for several years whether the company adequately regulates the use of the platform.
To read also: – Facebook harms children
Facebook employees also appear to have warned of the many false allegations that the election was stolen. However, the management had to do very little to organize the platform.
We print money
The new informant also referred to the Washington Post violations. According to the newspaper, the person in question worked in the integrity department of Facebook.
The whistleblower allegedly complained about Facebook’s reluctance to put security measures in place for fear of provoking Donald Trump and his supporters because they fear it will harm the company’s growth.
According to the court statement, the whistleblower had a conversation with Facebook communications manager Tucker Bounds, where he faced off against the Bounds, and said he was concerned about Facebook’s role in rigging the election of 2016.
Some lawmakers will be angry. And then, in a few weeks, they will find something else. Meanwhile, we’re printing money at the bottom, and it’s okay, Pounds reportedly said.
Today, Pounds won’t comment on the accusation, but he’s somewhat incomprehensible on the current issue.
Being asked about an alleged one-on-one conversation that took place four years ago with an unidentified person, without any other source for this meaningless accusation, is new to me, he told the newspaper.
– I have the impression of having participated in a genocide
The whistleblower also criticizes Facebook for failing to take action after receiving reports that the platform was used to disseminate hate speech during the Rohingya massacre in Myanmar in 2017.
Facebook has previously admitted that they haven’t done enough to reduce violence outside of their online domain.
In addition, the whistleblower feels responsible for what happened in Myanmar.
“While working for Facebook, I participated in a genocide,” he wrote in a statement to the court, according to the Washington Post.
refuses to take action
Facebook spokeswoman Erin McPeak dismisses the revelations and believes the case was based on a limited source.
It must be under the control of the Washington Post, you say, accusing the newspaper of competing with the New York Times in an attempt to discredit Facebook.
She believes Facebook has a vested interest in tackling disinformation and hate speech.
As a company, we have business and ethical incentives, which means giving as many people as possible a positive Facebook experience, McPike replies.
When asked what happened in Myanmar, MacBayk admitted that they had not done enough, but says they now have the proper regulations in place.
The spokeswoman said the way Facebook treats Myanmar today is fundamentally different from what it was in 2017, and the accusation that we have not invested in the security of the country is a false accusation. .